Social Commentator, Uncategorized

Szubanski, where’s my dawgone partner? I got rights ya no!

Magda Szubanski is clutching at straws. Szubanski and Barnes know they will lose the plebiscite; the country will vote against same sex marriage as they are entitled to that what all this malarky about rights is. The right to marry carries implicit obligations to a spouse and children; it is something more than a bunch of gays and dykes running around howling for a nuptial hoedown.

 

Standard
Social Commentator, Uncategorized

Family Court to go on application of Pauline!

I find it hard to believe that anyone could accept the word of Rosie Batty who is, of course, a leftwing feminist but more importantly because she voluntarily entered into a relationship with a man, Greg Anderson knowing that the man was unstable and dangerous; then having custody and control of a child, acted in an irresponsible manner. She then manipulated the system particularly the justice system and the Family Court to justify and exonerate her irresponsible behaviour. Pauline Hanson is merely giving expression to widely held views that the Family Court is not a Court at all but a bureau for the purposes of destroying the wealth and happiness of families on the application of women of the type, Rosie Batty.

 

Standard
Social Commentator, Uncategorized

A cup of tea given as a gesture of reconciliation for the billions handed out to Aboriginals by the taxpayer!

Well may you say, it’s how a person behaves toward others that counts? If every aboriginal person went off welfare and accepted responsibility for their own actions rather than put their hand out and justify their aggression to ordinary Australians on alleged past and imagined present acts of racism then the wider community may feel more comfortable. But given the daily insults and ethnic revenge taken against ordinary Australians, one can only wonder at aboriginals who appear surprised that an Australian might question their motives, behaviour and general demeanour. A cup of tea is hardly a return shout for the taxes handed out over the years.
Standard
Social Commentator, Uncategorized

AFL goes Apeshit over Bananas!

Yeah, well there ya go. Who owns the game of AFL? Aussie, Aussie, Aussie, oi, oi, oi. Ya know there is a very old saying that I had to rely on as a kid: Sticks and stones may break my bones by names will never hurt me. What crime did the woman commit and who has jurisdiction over her? All are agreed she threw a piece of fruit onto the field whilst a game was in play. She has been fined for disorderly behaviour by South Australian police a total of $543 plus a police barring order for six months. Hosch, AFL said the throwing of a banana and its association with slurs on indigenous Australians and other cultural groups, is deeply racist and offensive, and should be rejected by every part of our game; as a result the woman is banned indefinitely from attending any Port Adelaide games in the future. Eddie Betts says, we go out there to play footy and to entertain. We don’t want to be fearing for (our safety) and dodging stuff that comes onto the field. The Police and Betts see the incident as a public safety issue which in the scheme of things is fair enough and on the scale of punishment the woman should have got a warning and community service. $543 seems pretty vindictive for a first offender. As for the AFL, they need a lesson in word association or better still psychiatry: banana triggers monkey, monkey triggers Aboriginal; it this really the mindset of white Australia? It seems to me that the AFL have a template of clichéd racial slurs and insults that if trigged, will bring down upon the offender not only the wrath of God but that of the AFL. The better approach is to calmly examine each alleged incident on its merits. The convict overseers of Botany Bay have risen once again from our dim past and assumed the avatar of the AFL.

Standard
Uncategorized

Ban the Burkini.

The French have been beating up on Arabs since the time Napoleon invaded Egypt. They created a special force for the job, the French Foreign Legion. What they didn’t expect was that the Arabs would flock to France in return for the lesson in French culture. As to secularising Moslems, the French think they can do to Islam what they did to the Catholics. After the French Revolution in 1798, religion in France was brought under state control, discouraged as anti-revolutionary, and monastic orders were abolished. Moslems don’t give a fig about French concepts of the secular, laic. Strictly speaking, wearing outwards signs of religious identification such as clothes, images, headgear or any other religious apparel is prohibited in France but you try telling that to a Moslem. Capiche.

Standard